Analogy vs Homology
1. For your homologus traits provide the following
information (25 pts):
a. Briefly describe (not just identify) the two different
species that possess the homologous trait.
The point is to provide your reader (and grader) some background on the
species in question so we can understand the selection pressures that produced
these traits. Don’t short-change this.
This should be a paragraph of information, not just a few words and it
will be graded as such. (5 pts)
Whales and bats are two species that share the homologous
trait of the presence of a forelimb. Previously whales resided on land and used
their forelimbs for ground travel. At this point in their evolution. whales had
small forelimbs since they were much smaller animals that could move freely on
the ground. These early ancestors of the whale are believed to have lived a
more aquatic lifestyle and were mainly found in the bay type areas between freshwater
and the ocean. It is believed that these early species whales were able to drink
both freshwater and saltwater. As the whale’s species continued to evolve they became
more commonplace in primarily marine areas, and the ability to drink saltwater
became more prevalent. On the other hand, bats are the only mammals capable of
flying. Bats do not fossilize well so it has proven challenging to find
definitive information on their evolution. It is believed that the ancient
ancestors of the bat resided in trees and that they may have most likely had
smaller forelimbs which allowed them to glide from tree to tree. Recent
findings seem to point out that they most likely traveled in this manner during
the day using visual flight cues, since it has been determined that their
ability to fly preceded echolocation which guides the flight of current bats.
b. Describe the homologus trait of each species, focusing on
the differences in structure and function of the trait. Why do these homologus traits exhibit
differences between the two species?
Connect the differences in structure to differences in function to show
how they are related. Make sure your
explanation is clear and complete. (10 pts)
The presence of a forelimb, or a five-digit limb is a trait
that is not only common for these two species, but in other mammals which leads
to an assumption that all species with this trait share a common ancestor. The
forelimb for both the whales and bats are comprised of a humerus, ulna and
radius bones that end in the carpus that ultimately links to their five digits.
The forelimbs of the whale now serve as flippers for swimming and navigating
swiftly through the water. The flippers have increased in size over time to
allow the whale to increase its mobility in pursuit of rapidly evolving prey
and other predators. As the size of the whales have increased their flippers
have undergone a corresponding increase in size to support the dispersion of
the body weight of the whale. The whale can generate increased rate of speed
within the water by faster movement of the flippers but is also able to use the
flippers to make more precise, controlled navigation through the water. The
forelimbs of the bat now serve as wings for flying in the air. The increase in the
size of the wings over time facilitated the change from gliding to flying in
bats. Through this process four very long bones formed that were supported by a
small bone at the top of the wing which keeps the wing shape during flight.
This uniquely structured wing keeps the bat in the air, allows the ability to
travel through the air at a rapid rate and make very precise changes in
direction while in the air.
c. Who was (generally, not specifically) the common ancestor
of these two species and how do you know that ancestor possessed this
homologous trait? How does this support
your claim of homology? (5 pts)
The whale and bat share the common ancestor of a mammal that
was a land-dwelling species, which had a similar tetrapod structure. This common
ancestor most likely utilized its forelimbs for land travel based on its
ancestral living habitat. In addition to
the similarities of the skeletal structure of the forelimbs between whales and
bats, both species are also believed to have been land dwelling at one point in
their evolution. Thus, it is presumable that the difference in function of
their forelimbs is the result of adaptation resulting from the selective
pressures experienced in their different environments. This point supports
homology of the trait because the adaptations in the whales and bats reflect
descent with modification from the common ancestor.
d. Provide an image of each species in this comparison. (5 pts)
Bat

Whale
2. For your analogous traits provide the following
information (25 pts):
a. Describe the two different species that possess the
analogous trait. This should meet the
same amount of detail requested in the homologous section. (5 pts)
Dolphins and sharks are two species that share the analogous
trait of a tail fin. Dolphins are mammals with skeleton made of bones and their
ancestors are believed to have been land dwelling at one point in their
existence. During that time of their existence the species mainly lived near
marshlands. Speciation resulted in more aquatic traits developing in the ancient
dolphin species as over time they became more comfortable underwater and
spending less time on land. This evolutionary trend was evident in traits
developed by the species that allowed dolphins to hear, see and drink
underwater while their bodies became able to keep the water of out of their
airway. Sharks are believed to be the descendants of a much smaller fish species
since they have always been water dwelling beings. The skeleton of sharks is
comprised of cartilage instead of bone, and only their teeth are not made of this
soft material. Over the course of time sharks evolved and their jaws became
flexible allowing them the ability to eat much larger prey. Sharks have been
one of the primary predators of the ocean through their existence, so their feeding
habits led to increased size and the evolution of traits which have enhanced
their speed, smell and vision.
b. Describe the analogous trait of each species, focusing on
the similarities in structure and function of the trait. Clearly explain why these analogous traits exhibit
similarities between the two species, tying in environmental similarities that
drove the process of convergent evolution.
(10 pts)
Both sharks and dolphins have tail fins that are used to
help them swim and navigate through the water, which demonstrates that the tail
fin trait is analogous in that it serves the same purpose for both species. In
present times, both species are water dwelling beings thus they require the
ability to navigate efficiently through the water for feeding and survival
purposes. The tail fins provide both
species with unlimited movement possibilities within the water that allows them
to adapt to any situation. Although the tail fins serve the same purpose for
sharks and dolphins the appendages do have some distinct structural differences
that make this trait analogous. The tails of dolphins and sharks have distinct
differences in their positional orientation and in their primary movement
pattern. Dolphins have wide horizontal tails that they move in and up and down
motion to swim. On the other hand, sharks have tall vertical tails and move in
a side to side motion. The movement pattern of the dolphin and sharks are tied
to their skeletal structures. As mammals, the structure of the dolphin’s spine provides greater range of motion with the up and down movement. Whereas the shark as a fish have a notochord which requires side to side motion to work more efficiently with the muscle structure.
c. All pairs of organisms share some common ancestor if you
go back far enough in time. Could the
common ancestor of these two species have possessed this analogous trait? How do we know these traits are analogous and
not genetically related from common descent?
Use your knowledge of this ancestry and the evolutionary process to
provide evidence that these traits do not share a genetic lineage and are
therefore analogous. (5 pts)
The evolutionary evidence that I have presented provides several clear indications that development of the tail fin in sharks and dolphins are the result of convergent evolution as opposed to any type of genetic change in a common ancestor. I have pointed out that the skeletal structure between sharks and dolphins is different as evidenced by the presence of a cartilage skeleton in sharks which is consistent with fish ancestry vs a bone skeleton in dolphins which exist in mammals. I have noted that the dolphins ancestor was land dwelling at one point, whereas the sharks ancestor was always water dwelling. I have also noted that the movement patterns of the tail fin are consistent with the primary movements that are aligned with either a mammal (up and down, front to back) for dolphin and a fish (side to side) for the shark.
d. Provide an image of each species in this comparison. (5 pts)
Shark
Dolphin



Hi Denae,
ReplyDeleteI genuinely had no idea that whales and bats shared any form of similarity in structure so I found this very interesting to learn! I was not aware of how bats do not fossilize well. Hopefully new technology in upcoming years can help provide further insight into the evolution of bats. I always enjoy learning about different examples of evolution based on natural selection such as how you mentioned that whale flippers have increased over time to allow mobility in pursuit of predators! In regards to your analogous traits I was less surprised to find out that dolphins and sharks share an analogous trait of a tail fin. Nonetheless I appreciated learning how the traits which allowed “dolphins to hear, see and drink underwater” was inherited over time. I really appreciated your attention to detail throughout your post, but especially in your last paragraph. Well done!
Homology: In general, good description here, though the idea here was to describe the species in general, not focus on the traits in question.
ReplyDeleteFor the second section, understand that the traits that are actually homologous here are the respective skeletal structures. The fin and the wing are completely different traits. Only the bones are inherited from the common ancestor and it is the differences in the bones that need to be explained here in terms of their different functions. You do that to a degree for the bats but you don't describe the whale forelimb skeletal structures. How do the bones differ between these two organisms and how can those differences be explained in terms of their different functions?
Ancestry: In general, good here but careful:
"Thus, it is presumable that the difference in function of their forelimbs is the result of adaptation resulting from the selective pressures experienced in their different environments. "
No presuming necessary. Bats may be difficult to find in fossilized form but not impossible. We do have fossil evidence of the evolution of both of these organisms and this allows us to confirm that these traits arose from common descent. That's what we need to know to confirm homology.
Analogy: Good opening description.
"Both sharks and dolphins have tail fins that are used to help them swim and navigate through the water, which demonstrates that the tail fin trait is analogous in that it serves the same purpose for both species. "
You can't draw that conclusion just yet. You need to provide evidence that the structure didn't arise from common descent. For now, you can only conclude that these traits are serving the same function with similar structures. Otherwise, good discussion on the structural/functional similarities here.
You have a lot of good points in your ancestry section. Let's try to summarize so we can draw a distinct conclusion regarding analogy. The common ancestor of the dolphin and shark is an archaic fish, who did possess these fin structures and also passed that trait onto extant shark species. So the question is, did the dolphin also inherit it's fin from that common ancestor? Dolphins "fins" evolved after dolphins split off from terrestrial mammals, i.e., long after the split with ancient fish. This provides us with the evidence we need to confirm that this trait did evolve independently in at least one of these organisms, making these traits analogous.
Good images.